Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38028097›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2023

Good response to rectal diazepam in refractory cases of cyclic vomiting: A case-series and review of the literature.

Mansoureh Togha, Mahsa Babaei, Melika Jameie

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mansoureh ToghaNeurology department, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-6835
Mahsa BabaeiHeadache department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Melika JameieHeadache department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-9935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key Clinical Message: Although increasing in number, cases of CVS are being frequently misdiagnosed and many are refractory to the available treatments. This paper draws attention to a timely consideration of this disorder upon suspicion and proposes rectal diazepam and cinnarizine as highly effective treatments in refractory cases of CVS. Abstract: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a set of recurrent episodic attacks of nausea and vomiting. This is a migraine-related disorder that mostly affects children. Several medications have been recommended for abortive and prophylactic treatment. Unfortunately, in some cases, the treatment is not completely effective and affects the quality of life of the sufferer. In this paper, we report on two cases of children experiencing refractory CVS attacks who were not responsive to recommended medications for acute phase and prophylaxis. This account highlights the efficacy of rectal diazepam for the acute phase of CVS and cinnarizine, an anti-migraine and anti-histamine agent, for prophylaxis of further attacks.

Indexed as

cyclic syndromediazepammigrainenauseavomitingVomitingCinnarizine

Identifiers

PMID38028097
PMCPMC10661318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.