ArticleHeliyon2023
Efficacy and safety of purified starch for adhesion prevention in colorectal surgery.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevention of peritoneal adhesions after gynecological surgery: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation Starch-Based Hemostatic Agents "BioSight" as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Adhesion Model in Rats.Polymers · 2025Article
- Adhesion Prevention in Gynecologic Surgery: Guidance and Clinical Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adhesions within the abdominal cavity develop in as many as 90 % of individuals following abdominal surgery. However, the true adhesive condition of patients can only be ascertained during the second surgery. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized study to assess the anti-adhesion properties of purified starch in patients who had undergone colorectal surgery in the past and then needed a subsequent surgical intervention. Adhesion scores have been prospectively recorded in operation notes since January 2020 when patients underwent a second surgery. Patients who had received purified starch during their initial surgery constituted the purified starch group, while those who had not received anti-adhesion medical materials were the control group. The main objectives of the study were to evaluate the extent and severity of adhesions as primary outcomes, while secondary outcomes included measuring blood loss, operation time, and postoperative complications. Results: We analyzed the data of 101 patients, with 61 in the purified starch group and 40 in the control group. In multivariate analysis, adhesion severity (Odds ratio, 0.20, 95 % confidence interval 0.08-0.54, P < 0.01) and adhesion area scores (Odds ratio, 0.13, 95 % confidence interval 0.04-0.45, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the purified starch group than in the control group. There was no significant difference in operation times, blood loss, and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: Purified starch is a safe and effective anti-adhesion material that can significantly reduce the severity and extent of adhesion after colorectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.