ArticleHeliyon2023
Multi-ontology embeddings approach on human-aligned multi-ontologies representation for gene-disease associations prediction.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Knowledge graphs and ontologies in the biomedical domain provide rich contextual knowledge for a variety of challenges. Employing that for knowledge-driven NLP tasks such as gene-disease association prediction represents a promising way to increase the predictive power of a model. Methods: We investigated the power of infusing the embedding of two aligned ontologies as prior knowledge to the NLP models. We evaluated the performance of different models on some large-scale gene-disease association datasets and compared it with a model without incorporating contextualized knowledge (BERT). Results: The experiments demonstrated that the knowledge-infused model slightly outperforms BERT by creating a small number of bridges. Thus, indicating that incorporating cross-references across ontologies can enhance the performance of base models without the need for more complex and costly training. However, further research is needed to explore the generalizability of the model. We expected that adding more bridges would bring further improvement based on the trend we observed in the experiments. In addition, the use of state-of-the-art knowledge graph embedding methods on a joint graph from connecting OGG and DOID with bridges also yielded promising results. Conclusion: Our work shows that allowing language models to leverage structured knowledge from ontologies does come with clear advantages in the performance. Besides, the annotation stage brought out in this paper is constrained in reasonable complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.