ArticleHeliyon2023
Evaluation of prescribing patterns using WHO core drug use indicators in a pediatric hospital of Kabul Afghanistan: A prospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on Evaluation of WHO Core Prescribing Indicators Across Healthcare Facilities in Low Resource Asian Setting: A Case of Nepal.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- A survey on the attitudes of pediatric residents toward rational use of medicines and associated factors in Izmir, Turkey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global issue of irrational drug use, particularly concerning pediatric patients, is a significant concern. Notably, there has been a lack of studies assessing rational drug prescribing for pediatric patients within Afghanistan's healthcare system. This investigation aimed to address this gap by examining drug prescribing patterns at the Indira Gandhi Pediatric Health Institute (IPHI) in Kabul, Afghanistan. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted to evaluate the prevailing drug prescribing practices at the outpatient department of IPHI in Kabul, Afghanistan. A systematic random sampling method was employed to select 600 outpatient prescriptions from the institute, following the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for investigating drug utilization in healthcare facilities. Results: The average age of patients was 4 years, and the average number of drugs per prescription was 2.9. Notably, 84% of prescriptions included one or more antibiotics, surpassing the WHO standard of <30%. Furthermore, 67% of the prescribed drugs were listed on Afghanistan's national essential drugs list (EDL), falling below the standard value of 100%. Only 35.1% of the prescribed drugs were in generic form, also lower than the recommended 100%. Moreover, 5.7% of all prescriptions included injections, the ideal value is <20%. The most frequently prescribed drug groups were anti-microbials (25.7%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (21.4%), gastrointestinal drugs (17.3%), and vitamins (7.8%). Conclusion: The study's findings indicate that, on average, a higher number of drugs were prescribed per patient visit at IPHI compared to recommended standards. Additionally, there was a lower utilization of generic drugs and drugs from Afghanistan's national essential drugs list (EDL), with an over-prescription of antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.