ArticleHeliyon2023
Nanobead-based single-molecule pulldown for single cells.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Biophysics at the Membrane with Single-Molecule TIRF Microscopy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Deciphering cellular complexity: advances and future directions in single-cell protein analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigation of cell-to-cell variability holds critical physiological and clinical implications. Thus, numerous new techniques have been developed for studying cell-to-cell variability, and these single-cell techniques can also be used to investigate rare cells. Moreover, for studying protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in single cells, several techniques have been developed based on the principle of the single-molecule pulldown (SiMPull) assay. However, the applicability of these single-cell SiMPull (sc-SiMPull) techniques is limited because of their high technical barrier and special requirements for target cells and molecules. Here, we report a highly innovative nanobead-based approach for sc-SiMPull that is based on our recently developed microbead-based, improved version of SiMPull for cell populations. In our sc-SiMPull method, single cells are captured in microwells and lysed in situ, after which commercially available, pre-surface-functionalized magnetic nanobeads are placed in the microwells to specifically capture proteins of interest together with their binding partners from cell extracts; subsequently, the PPIs are examined under a microscope at the single-molecule level. Relative to previously published methods, nanobead-based sc-SiMPull is considerably faster, easier to use, more reproducible, and more versatile for distinct cell types and protein molecules, and yet provides similar sensitivity and signal-to-background ratio. These crucial features should enable universal application of our method to the study of PPIs in single cells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.