Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027954›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

An overview of image-based phenotyping as an adaptive 4.0 technology for studying plant abiotic stress: A bibliometric and literature review.

Muhammad Fuad Anshori, Andi Dirpan, Trias Sitaresmi, Riccardo Rossi, Muh Farid, Aris Hairmansis, Bambang Sapta Purwoko, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Yudhistira Nugraha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using supervised machine-learning approaches to understand abiotic stress tolerance and design resilient crops.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad Fuad AnshoriDepartment of Agronomy, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 90245, Indonesia.
Andi DirpanDepartment of Agricultural Technology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 90245, Indonesia.
Trias SitaresmiResearch Center for Food Crops, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, 16911, Cibinong, Indonesia.
Riccardo RossiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence (UNIFI), Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144, Florence, Italy.
Muh FaridDepartment of Agronomy, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 90245, Indonesia.
Aris HairmansisResearch Center for Food Crops, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, 16911, Cibinong, Indonesia.
Bambang Sapta PurwokoDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, 11680, Indonesia.
Willy Bayuardi SuwarnoDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, 11680, Indonesia.
Yudhistira NugrahaResearch Center for Food Crops, Research Organization for Agriculture and Food, National Research and Innovation Agency, 16911, Cibinong, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the tolerance of crop species to abiotic stresses that limit plant growth and productivity is essential for mitigating the emerging problems of global warming. In this context, imaged data analysis represents an effective method in the 4.0 technology era, where this method has the non-destructive and recursive characterization of plant phenotypic traits as selection criteria. So, the plant breeders are helped in the development of adapted and climate-resilient crop varieties. Although image-based phenotyping has recently resulted in remarkable improvements for identifying the crop status under a range of growing conditions, the topic of its application for assessing the plant behavioral responses to abiotic stressors has not yet been extensively reviewed. For such a purpose, bibliometric analysis is an ideal analytical concept to analyze the evolution and interplay of image-based phenotyping to abiotic stresses by objectively reviewing the literature in light of existing database. Bibliometricy, a bibliometric analysis was applied using a systematic methodology which involved data mining, mining data improvement and analysis, and manuscript construction. The obtained results indicate that there are 554 documents related to image-based phenotyping to abiotic stress until 5 January 2023. All document showed the future development trends of image-based phenotyping will be mainly centered in the United States, European continent and China. The keywords analysis major focus to the application of 4.0 technology and machine learning in plant breeding, especially to create the tolerant variety under abiotic stresses. Drought and saline become an abiotic stress often using image-based phenotyping. Besides that, the rice, wheat and maize as the main commodities in this topic. In conclusion, the present work provides information on resolutive interactions in developing image-based phenotyping to abiotic stress, especially optimizing high-throughput sensors in image-based phenotyping for the future development.

Indexed as

Analytic reviewDigitalization 4.0 technologyHigh-throughput phenotypingPlant breedingSalinity stressWater deficit

Identifiers

PMID38027954
PMCPMC10660044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.