ArticleHeliyon2023
Prenatal diagnosis of fetal digestive system malformations and pregnancy outcomes at a tertiary referral center in Fujian, China: A retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic evaluation and pregnancy outcome of fetuses with digestive system malformations: an eight-year single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Experience in enteral and parenteral nutrition schemes for familial congenital short bowel syndrome: Two case reports.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Prenatal diagnosis and family analysis of 17q12 microdeletion syndrome with fetal renal abnormalities.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal digestive system malformations (DSMs) are correlated with chromosomal anomalies. The prenatal diagnosis of DSMs allows for timely treatment and reduces perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, genetic screening for fetal DSMs is rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in cases of fetal DSM by analyzing correlations between DSM types and chromosomal anomalies. This retrospective single-center study included 126 fetuses in whom DSMs were detected via prenatal ultrasonography. Genetic etiology was investigated using conventional karyotyping, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and whole-exome sequencing (WES). DSMs were categorized as simple DSM (Group A), DSM combined with abnormal ultrasound soft markers (Group B), and DSM combined with comorbidities of other systems (Group C). Abnormal karyotypes were detected in 11/126 (8.7 %) fetuses. Four more pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) were detected using CMA, increasing the detection rate to 11.9 %. The detection rates significantly differed between the three DSM types (1.78 %, 8.11 %, and 33.33 % in Groups A, B, and C, respectively). The overall adverse pregnancy outcome rate was 33.9 %, and 11.5 %, 23.5 %, and 81.3 %, (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.