ArticleHeliyon2023
SAR model for accurate detection of multi-label arrhythmias from electrocardiograms.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Arrhythmias are prevalent symptoms of cardiovascular disease, necessitating accurate and timely detection to mitigate associated risks. Detecting arrhythmias from ECGs quickly and accurately holds great significance in preventing heart disease and reducing mortality. This research endeavors to outperform previous studies by developing a scientific neural network model capable of training and predicting ECG signals for 11 categories of arrhythmias, accounting for up to 5 co-existing labels. Methods: In this study, we initially address the issue of imbalanced datasets by employing Borderline SMOTE and Cluster Centroids techniques during preprocessing. Subsequently, we propose a novel SAR model that combines attention and resnet mechanisms. The dataset is subjected to a 10-fold validation process to train and evaluate the model. Finally, several metrics such as HammingLoss, RankingLoss, F1-score, AUC and Coverage are used to evaluate the model. Results: By evaluating the results of the tests, the average Hamming Loss is 1.12 %, the average Ranking Loss is 1.17 %, the average Micro F1-score is 98.46 %, the average Micro AUC is 98.76 %, and the average Coverage is 3.2762. The results show that the SAR model outperforms previous related studies on the task of classifying arrhythmia signals with multiple categories and labels. Conclusion: The SAR model demonstrated excellent performance in accurately classifying multi-category and multi-label arrhythmia signals, affirming its scientific validity. Compared with previous studies, the model achieves a certain improvement in performance, which can help cardiologists to achieve scientific and accurate diagnosis of arrhythmia diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.