ArticleHeliyon2023
Security or severity? A research of COVID-19 pandemic control policy based on nonlinear programming approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused huge impacts to human health and world's econ-omy. Finding out the balance between social productions and pandemic control becomes crucial. In this paper, we first extend the SIR model by introducing two new status. We calibrate the model by 2022 Shanghai COVID-19 outbreak. The results shows compared to zero-constraint policy, under our control policy, 50 % more life can be saved at the cost of 2.13 % loss of consumptions. Our results also emphasize the importance of the dynamic nature and the timing of control policy, either a static pandemic control or a lagged pandemic control damages badly to people's livelihood and social productions. Counter factual experiments show that compared to the baseline, when a persistent high-strength control is applied, aggregate productions decreases by 57 %; when pandemic control ends too early, the death would rise by 15 %, when pandemic control starts too late, the death rises by 23 % and aggregate productions decreases by 13 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.