ArticleHeliyon2023
ASD
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children Using Glowworm Optimization With Extreme Learning Machine Networks.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of AI-Based Approaches for Detecting Autism Traits Using Voice and Behavioral Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Leveraging AI-Driven Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Early Detection and Social Function Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating vision transformer-based deep learning model with kernel extreme learning machine for non-invasive diagnosis of neonatal jaundice using biomedical images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) treatment requires accurate diagnosis and effective rehabilitation. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in medical diagnosis and rehabilitation can aid doctors in detecting a wide range of diseases more effectively. Nevertheless, due to its highly heterogeneous symptoms and complicated nature, ASD diagnostics continues to be a challenge for researchers. This study introduces an intelligent system based on the Artificial Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO) metaheuristic optimizer to detect ASD using Deep Learning and Machine Learning. Kaggle and UCI ML Repository are the data sources used in this study. The first dataset is the Autistic Children Data Set, which contains 3,374 facial images of children divided into Autistic and Non-Autistic categories. The second dataset is a compilation of data from three numerical repositories: (1) Autism Screening Adults, (2) Autistic Spectrum Disorder Screening Data for Adolescents, and (3) Autistic Spectrum Disorder Screening Data for Children. When it comes to image dataset experiments, the most notable results are (1) a TF learning ratio greater than or equal to 50 is recommended, (2) all models recommend data augmentation, and (3) the DenseNet169 model reports the lowest loss value of 0.512. Concerning the numeric dataset, five experiments recommend standardization and the final five attributes are optional in the classification process. The performance metrics demonstrate the worthiness of the proposed feature selection technique using GTO more than counterparts in the literature review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.