Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027895›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Integrating clinical research in an operative screening and diagnostic breast imaging department: First experience, results and perspectives using microwave imaging.

Daniel Álvarez Sánchez-Bayuela, Rubén Giovanetti González, Paul Martín Aguilar Angulo, Lina Marcela Cruz Hernández, María Del Pilar Sánchez-Camacho González-Carrato, Ana Rodríguez Sánchez, Gianluigi Tiberi, Cristina Romero Castellano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel Álvarez Sánchez-BayuelaBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Rubén Giovanetti GonzálezBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Paul Martín Aguilar AnguloBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Lina Marcela Cruz HernándezBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
María Del Pilar Sánchez-Camacho González-CarratoBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Ana Rodríguez SánchezBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Gianluigi TiberiUBT-Umbria Bioengineering Technologies, 06081, Perugia, Italy.
Cristina Romero CastellanoBreast Imaging Department, Radiology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo · ESLondon South Bank University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Clinical research is crucial for evaluating new medical procedures and devices. It is important for healthcare units and hospitals to minimize the disruptions caused by conducting clinical studies; however, complex clinical pathways require dedicated recruitment and study designs.This work presents the effective introduction of novel microwave breast imaging (MBI), via MammoWave apparatus, into the clinical routine of an operative screening and diagnostic breast imaging department for conducting a multicentric clinical study. Materials and methods: Microwave breast imaging, using MammoWave apparatus, was performed on volunteers coming from different clinical pathways. Clinical data, comprising demographics and conventional radiologic reports (used as reference standard), was collected; a satisfaction questionnaire was filled by every volunteer. Microwave images were analyzed by an automatic clinical decision support system, which quantified their corresponding features to discriminate between breasts with no relevant radiological findings (NF) and breasts with described findings (WF). Results: Conventional breast imaging (DBT, US, MRI) and MBI were performed and adapted to assure best clinical practices and optimum pathways. 180 volunteers, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, were enrolled in the study. After microwave images' quality assessment, 48 NF (15 dense) and 169 WF (88 dense) breasts were used for the prospective study; 48 (18 dense) breasts suffered from a histology-confirmed carcinoma. An overall sensitivity of 85.8 % in breasts lesions' detection was achieved by the microwave imaging apparatus. Conclusion: An optimum recruitment strategy was implemented to assess MBI. Future trials may show the clinical usefulness of microwave imaging, which may play an important role in breast screening.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast imaging researchBreast lesionsMicrowave breast imagingMicrowave imaging

Identifiers

PMID38027895
PMCPMC10661199
OpenAlexW4388281701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.