ArticleHeliyon2023
Azure Kinect performance evaluation for human motion and upper limb biomechanical analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent Validation of a Multi-Camera Markerless Motion Capture System Against Inertial Sensors for Upper- and Lower-Limb Joint Kinematics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of Azure Kinect for Upper Limb Motion Analysis Under Optimal and Suboptimal Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Multi-Camera Markerless System for Capturing Basketball-Specific Movements: An Exploration Using 25 Hz Video Streams.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Kinematic instrumental assessment quantifies compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Observational
- Evaluation of Commercial Camera-Based Solutions for Tracking Hand Kinematics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The State of the Art and Potentialities of UAV-Based 3D Measurement Solutions in the Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Quasi-Brittle Structures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Operatic Singing Biomechanics: Skeletal Tracking Sensor Integration for Pedagogical Innovation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of Microsoft Kinect Azure and manual measurement methods in the sit and reach test among elite female weightlifters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Feasibility of YOLOX computer model-based assessment of knee function compared with manual assessment for people with severe knee osteoarthritis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Markerless Motion Analysis Using New Digital Technology.Physical therapy research · 2025Review
- Article
- Exergames as a rehabilitation tool to enhance the upper limbs functionality and performance in chronic stroke survivors: a preliminary study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human motion tracking is a valuable task for many medical applications. Marker-based optoelectronic systems are considered the gold standard in human motion tracking. However, their use is not always feasible in clinics and industrial environments. On the other hand, marker-less sensors became valuable tools, as they are inexpensive, noninvasive and easy to use. However, their accuracy can depend on many factors including sensor positioning, light conditions and body occlusions. In this study, following previous works on the feasibility of marker-less systems for human motion monitoring, we investigate the performance of the Microsoft Azure Kinect sensor in computing kinematic and dynamic measurements of static postures and dynamic movements. According to our knowledge, it is the first time that this sensor is compared with a Vicon marker-based system to assess the best camera positioning while observing the upper body part movements of people performing several tasks. Twenty-five healthy volunteers were monitored to evaluate the effects of the several testing conditions, including the Azure Kinect positions, the light conditions, and lower limbs occlusions, on the tracking accuracy of kinematic, dynamic, and motor control parameters. From the statistical analysis of the performed measurements, the camera in the frontal position was the most reliable, the lighting conditions had almost no effects on the tracking accuracy, while the lower limbs occlusion worsened the accuracy of the upper limbs. The assessment of human static postures and dynamic movements based on experimental data proves the feasibility of applying the Azure Kinect to the biomechanical monitoring of human motion in several fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.