Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027880›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Advantages and disadvantages of treatment of experimental ARDS by M2-polarized RAW 264.7 macrophages.

A M Kosyreva, P A Vishnyakova, I S Tsvetkov, V V Kiseleva, D Sh Dzhalilova, E A Miroshnichenko, A V Lokhonina, O V Makarova, T H Fatkhudinov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A M KosyrevaResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
P A VishnyakovaResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
I S TsvetkovAvtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, 3 Tsyurupy Street, 117418, Moscow, Russia.
V V KiselevaResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
D Sh DzhalilovaResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
E A MiroshnichenkoResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
A V LokhoninaResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
O V MakarovaAvtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, 3 Tsyurupy Street, 117418, Moscow, Russia.
T H FatkhudinovResearch Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198, Moscow, Russia.
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUResearch Institute of Human Morphology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immunity reactions are core to any immunological process, including systemic inflammation and such extremes as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cytokine storm. Macrophages, the key cells of innate immunity, show high phenotypic plasticity: depending on microenvironmental cues, they can polarize into M1 (classically activated, pro-inflammatory) or M2 (alternatively activated, anti-inflammatory). The anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization-based cell therapies constitute a novel prospective modality. Systemic administration of 'educated' macrophages is intended at their homing in lungs in order to mitigate the pro-inflammatory cytokine production and reduce the risks of 'cytokine storm' and related severe complications. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the main mortality factor in pneumonia including SARS-CoV-associated cases. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of infusions of RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line polarized towards M2 phenotype on the development of LPS-induced ARDS in mouse model. The results indicate that the M2-polarized RAW 264.7 macrophage infusions in the studied model of ARDS promote relocation of lymphocytes from their depots in immune organs to the lungs. In addition, the treatment facilitates expression of M2-polarization markers

Indexed as

ARDSImmune systemInflammationLPSLungMacrophagePolarizationTherapy

Identifiers

PMID38027880
PMCPMC10658332
OpenAlexW4388116168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.