ArticleHeliyon2023
Evaluation of phase change material-graphene nanocomposite for thermal regulation enhancement in buildings.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Concept of Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Material.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growth of high-efficiency phase change material (PCM) nanocomposites with good heat conduction and substantial thermal capacity was of vital significance for practical matters in the sustainable utilization of energy. A novel leakage-proof n-heptadecane-graphene nanocomposite was prepared by a direct impregnation procedure from n-heptadacne as a PCM and nanographene as a skeleton. The creation of shape-stabilized nanocomposite was checked with X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis illustrated that the n-heptadecane and graphene had favourable compatibility and there was no phase separation and graphene accumulation. Thermal analysis showed that the shape-stabilized nanocomposite not only had a good phase transition enthalpy (101.7 J/g) and n-heptadecane content (45.6 %) but also possessed appropriate thermal stability. The heat conduction of the obtained mesoporous nanocomposite was up to 1.527 W/mK, with a growth of 808 % compared to pure n-heptadecane. Furthermore, the optimized nanocomposite held auspicious thermal reliability, being exposed to 400 thermal cycles. Moreover, the thermoregulation tests demonstrated that the gypsum boards containing optimized nanocomposite showed a slow heat release rate and improved the building temperature profile over only the gypsum board. By virtue of the combination of n-heptadecane and thermal conductive nanographene, the obtained engineered nanocomposite might be regarded as a smart material for energy-conserving and temperature regulation in buildings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.