Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027730›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Computation of a probabilistic uranium concentration map of Norway: A digital expert elicitation approach employing random forests and artificial neural networks.

Hendrik Paasche, Ying Wang, Vikas Chand Baranwal, Marco Brönner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hendrik PaascheUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH, Department Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Ying WangGeological Survey of Norway (NGU), Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, Norway.
Vikas Chand BaranwalGeological Survey of Norway (NGU), Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, Norway.
Marco BrönnerGeological Survey of Norway (NGU), Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compute the first probabilistic uranium concentration map of Norway. Such a map can support mineral exploration, geochemical mapping, or the assessment of the health risk to the human population. We employ multiple non-linear regression to fill the information gaps in sparse airborne and ground-borne uranium data sets. We mimic an expert elicitation by employing Random Forests and Multi-layer Perceptrons as digital agents equally qualified to find regression models. In addition to the regression, we use supervised classification to produce conservative and alarmistic classified maps outlining regions with different potential for the local occurrence of uranium concentration extremes. Embedding the introduced digital expert elicitation in a Monte Carlo approach we compute an ensemble of plausible uranium concentrations maps of Norway discretely quantifying the uncertainty resulting from the choice of the regression algorithm and the chosen parametrization of the used regression algorithms. We introduce digitated glyphs to visually integrate all computed maps and their associated uncertainties in a loss-free manner to fully communicate our probabilistic results to map perceivers. A strong correlation between mapped geology and uranium concentration is found, which could be used to optimize future sparse uranium concentration sampling to lower extrapolation components in future map updates.

Indexed as

Expert elicitationGeophysicsModel uncertaintyMonte CarloNon-linear regressionNorwayRadiometryUncertainty quantificationUranium concentration

Identifiers

PMID38027730
PMCPMC10660982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.