ArticleHeliyon2023
Human skin type classification using image processing and deep learning approaches.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal skin care system using combined image and impedance-based diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Skin in the game: a review of computational models of the skin.BioData mining · 2025Review
- AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Predicts Fitzpatrick Skin Type, Pigmentation, Redness, and Wrinkle Severity From Color Photographs of the Face.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cosmetics consumers need to be aware of their skin type before purchasing products. Identifying skin types can be challenging, especially when they vary from oily to dry in different areas, with skin specialist providing more accurate results. In recent years, artificial intelligence and machine learning have been utilized across various fields, including medicine, to assist in identifying and predicting situations. This study developed a skin type classification model using a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) deep learning algorithms. The dataset consisted of normal, oily, and dry skin images, with 112 images for normal skin, 120 images for oily skin, and 97 images for dry skin. Image quality was enhanced using the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) technique, with data augmentation by rotation applied to increase dataset variety, resulting in a total of 1,316 images. CNN architectures including MobileNet-V2, EfficientNet-V2, InceptionV2, and ResNet-V1 were optimized and evaluated. Findings showed that the EfficientNet-V2 architecture performed the best, achieving an accuracy of 91.55% with average loss of 22.74%. To further improve the model, hyperparameter tuning was conducted, resulting in an accuracy of 94.57% and a loss of 13.77%. The Model performance was validated using 10-fold cross-validation and tested on unseen data, achieving an accuracy of 89.70% with a loss of 21.68%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.