Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027629›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Evaluation of CMIP6 model performance and extreme precipitation prediction in the Awash basin.

Chala Hailu Sime, Wakjira Takala Dibaba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. First Record ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chala Hailu SimeDepartment of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma, 378, Ethiopia.
Wakjira Takala DibabaDepartment of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma, 378, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme rainfall and its accompanying hydrological extremes are happening more frequently as a result of global warming's alteration of regional and local weather patterns. This poses a serious risk to ecosystem, environment and the community livelihoods. The Awash basin in Ethiopia is especially vulnerable to these events, posing significant threats to the region. There are, however, limited information's available that could be used to characterize the condition of extreme precipitation in the basin. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the performance of CMIP6 models in simulating extreme precipitation in the Awash basin. Additionally, the study calculated extreme precipitation using best-fit probability distribution functions (PDFs) for the period from 1985 to 2014. The Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with station data (CHIRPS) were used to evaluate the global climate models. Simulated data were interpolated using bilinear techniques. Four statistical indices (percentage of bias, root mean square error, mean absolute error, and Pearson correlation) assessed GCM performance in simulating precipitation extremes. Graphical approaches, numerical methods, and empirical distribution functions were employed to evaluate the performance of various probability distribution functions (PDFs). The study identified MIROC6, CESM2-WACCM, and Ensemble as well-performing models with PBIAS and RMSE of 6.6 %, -10.2 %, -17.2 %, and 11.5, 10, 9.7 respectively, while MPI-ESM1-2-HR and EC-Earth3 struggled with extreme rainfall simulation. The generalized extreme values distribution was found to be a good fit for extreme rainfall estimation. GFDL-ESM4 and BCC-CSM2-MR models estimated the highest extreme rainfall of 90 mm/day and 80 mm/day, respectively, however these models overestimated the return period. Conversely, MRI-ESM2-0, NorESM2-MM, ACCESS ESM1-5, and CMCC-ESM2 models underestimated the return periods. Spatially, GFDL-ESM4 and ACCESS-ESM1-5 models exhibited uniform peak rainfall values over a large area. Overall, the study suggests that employing the generalized extreme value distribution could effectively inform risk assessment and management of extreme events in the Awash basin.

Indexed as

Awash basinBest fitCMIP6Extreme precipitationGeneral extreme value

Identifiers

PMID38027629
PMCPMC10660038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.