ArticleHeliyon2023
Preparation of chemically and thermally modified water caltrop epicarp (
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Process optimization and modeling research for the defluoridation of water using a novel adsorbent of cellulose and hydroxyapatite nanocomposite.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expermental investigation on adsorption of methylene blue dye from waste water using corncob cellulose-based hydrogel.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aims to prepare waste water caltrop (Trapanatans L.) epicarp (WCS)-based adsorbents such as raw WCS (WCS-Raw), citric acid-grafted WCS (WCS-CA), acrylamide-grafted WCS (WCS-AM), and calcined WCS (WCS-Si) for Ni(II) removal from aqueous solution in batch adsorption process. The physical and chemical properties of the prepared adsorbents were investigated by different characterization techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, nitrogen adsorption-desorption analyses, and pH at the Point of Zero Charge (pHpzc) in order to assess the suitability and effectiveness of the adsorbents for the removal of Ni(II) by understanding their surface morphology, chemical composition, porosity, and surface charge properties. The experimental Ni(II) adsorption data followed both the Langmuir isotherm and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model suggesting the adsorption process on the prepared adsorbents is well-described by these models. The modified adsorbents WCS-CA, WCS-AM, and WCS-Si exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 52.08, 40.32, and 158.73 mg/g, respectively, while WCS-Raw had a capacity of 29.06 mg/g. The thermodynamic study revealed that the adsorption process was feasible, spontaneous, and endothermic. The desorption study demonstrated that the adsorbents could be reused for multiple cycles with minimal loss of activity. The present work evidenced the potential practical applicability and sustainability of the WCS-based adsorbents as promising adsorbents in treating and removing Ni(II) from wastewater.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.