Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027595›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

A hierarchical prognostic model for Co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Zelong Wu, Chunsheng Liu, Zuyi Ma, Zhenchong Li, Shujie Wang, Yubin Chen, Mingqian Han, Shanzhou Huang, Qi Zhou, Chuanzhao Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zelong WuThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Chunsheng LiuThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Zuyi MaDepartment of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Zhenchong LiGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Junior Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Gastrointestinal Oncology and Preclinical Models, Heidelberg, Germany.
Shujie WangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Yubin ChenThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Mingqian HanThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Shanzhou HuangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Qi ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Chuanzhao ZhangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Baohua HouThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a poorer prognosis than pancreatic adenocarcinoma without diabetes. This study aimed to develop a reliable prognostic model for patients with co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Method: Overall, 169 patients with co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in our study. First, the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinoma were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Based on these identified risk factors, we developed a nomogram and evaluated its predictive ability using the concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plot, decision curve, and net reclassification index. Results: In this study, prealbumin, transferrin, carcinoembryonic antigen, distant metastasis, tumor differentiation neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and fasting blood glucose were confirmed as significant prognostic factors. Based on these predictors, a new nomogram was developed. Compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8 staging system and other models, the nomogram achieved a higher concordance index in the training (0.795) and validation (0.729) queues. The area under the nomogram's curve for predicting patient survival at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 years in the training queue was >0.8. Patients were risk-stratified using the nomogram, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves of subgroups were plotted. The Kaplan-Meier curve also showed better separation than the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8 staging system, indicating that our model has a better risk hierarchical ability. Conclusions: Compared to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8 staging system and other predictive models, our model showed better predictive ability for patients with co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our model will help in patients' risk stratification and improves their prognosis.

Indexed as

Co-diabetes pancreatic adenocarcinomaNomogramOverall survivalPrealbuminPrognostic hierarchicalTransferrin

Identifiers

PMID38027595
PMCPMC10663840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.