Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027567›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Fatigue among Air crews on (Ultra)-Long-Range flights - A comparison of subjective fatigue with objective concentration ability.

David Gläsener, Janina Post, David Cyrol, Stefan Sammito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David GläsenerGerman Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Wahn, Germany.
Janina PostGerman Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Wahn, Germany.
David CyrolGerman Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Wahn, Germany.
Stefan SammitoGerman Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Wahn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Long duty times are common in the aviation industry, especially with the introduction of ultra long range flights (ULR). This article aims to compare the subjective fatigue assessment and concentration ability of flight crews with objective concentration and alertness tests during (U)LR-flights. Method: The study examined different (U)LR-flights. Before, during and after the flights subjective fatigue and concentration ability of the flight crew was examined with visual analog scale and objective attention and concentration ability with the FAIR-2 test respectively the 3-min Psychomotor Vigilance Test. For statistical analysis we used a repeated ANOVA with a post-hoc-analysis and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for connected samples. Results: In total 28 crew members were examined. Subjective concentration ability declined and fatigue increased significantly over the course of flights. However, no significant changes were observed in the objective concentration tests performed before and after the flights. Conclusions: The study found that fatigue significantly increased with flight time, particularly during night hours at the window of circadian low of the crews. However, objective concentration performance showed no significant deterioration over time. The study's results were consistent with previous research, except for the finding that objective concentration was still stable. The study also compared the findings to another profession and found similar results regarding the performance of complex tasks after long working hours while experiencing fatigue. Pratical applications: This study helps to understand the effects of ultra long-range flight on fatigue and concentration of the air crew and can help to improve safety issues on such flights.

Indexed as

AerospaceAircrewConcentrationFatigueLong duration flight

Identifiers

PMID38027567
PMCPMC10663845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.