Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027521›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Signal processing and stimulation potential within the ascending auditory pathway: a review.

Alexandra E Quimby, Kimberly Wei, Dayo Adewole, Steven Eliades, D Kacy Cullen, Jason A Brant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra E QuimbyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
Kimberly WeiPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Dayo AdewoleCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Steven EliadesDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
D Kacy CullenPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jason A BrantPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

Living electrodes for auditory rehabilitation.IK2BX004910 · VA · WM S. MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSP · PI BRANT, JASON · 2021 to 2025
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX004910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human auditory system encodes sound with a high degree of temporal and spectral resolution. When hearing fails, existing neuroprosthetics such as cochlear implants may partially restore hearing through stimulation of auditory neurons at the level of the cochlea, though not without limitations inherent to electrical stimulation. Novel approaches to hearing restoration, such as optogenetics, offer the potential of improved performance. We review signal processing in the ascending auditory pathway and the current state of conventional and emerging neural stimulation strategies at various levels of the auditory system.

Indexed as

auditory pathwayauditory signal processingcentral auditory processingcochlear implant – neuroprosthesisoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID38027521
PMCPMC10658786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.