Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027508›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Learnable axonal delay in spiking neural networks improves spoken word recognition.

Pengfei Sun, Yansong Chua, Paul Devos, Dick Botteldooren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengfei SunDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Yansong ChuaNeuromorphic Computing Laboratory, China Nanhu Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, Jiaxing, China.
Paul DevosDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dick BotteldoorenDepartment of Information Technology, WAVES Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking neural networks (SNNs), which are composed of biologically plausible spiking neurons, and combined with bio-physically realistic auditory periphery models, offer a means to explore and understand human auditory processing-especially in tasks where precise timing is essential. However, because of the inherent temporal complexity in spike sequences, the performance of SNNs has remained less competitive compared to artificial neural networks (ANNs). To tackle this challenge, a fundamental research topic is the configuration of spike-timing and the exploration of more intricate architectures. In this work, we demonstrate a learnable axonal delay combined with local skip-connections yields state-of-the-art performance on challenging benchmarks for spoken word recognition. Additionally, we introduce an auxiliary loss term to further enhance accuracy and stability. Experiments on the neuromorphic speech benchmark datasets, NTIDIDIGITS and SHD, show improvements in performance when incorporating our delay module in comparison to vanilla feedforward SNNs. Specifically, with the integration of our delay module, the performance on NTIDIDIGITS and SHD improves by 14% and 18%, respectively. When paired with local skip-connections and the auxiliary loss, our approach surpasses both recurrent and convolutional neural networks, yet uses 10 × fewer parameters for NTIDIDIGITS and 7 × fewer for SHD.

Indexed as

auditory modelingaxonal delayneuromorphic computingspeech processingspiking neural networksupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38027508
PMCPMC10665570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.