ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Possibilistic distribution distance metric: a robust domain adaptation learning method.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discriminative possibilistic clustering promoting cross-domain emotion recognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The affective Brain-Computer Interface (aBCI) systems, which achieve predictions for individual subjects through training on multiple subjects, often cannot achieve satisfactory results due to the differences in Electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns between subjects. One tried to use Subject-specific classifiers, but there was a lack of sufficient labeled data. To solve this problem, Domain Adaptation (DA) has recently received widespread attention in the field of EEG-based emotion recognition. Domain adaptation (DA) learning aims to solve the problem of inconsistent distributions between training and test datasets and has received extensive attention. Most existing methods use Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) or its variants to minimize the problem of domain distribution inconsistency. However, noisy data in the domain can lead to significant drift in domain means, which can affect the adaptability performance of learning methods based on MMD and its variants to some extent. Therefore, we propose a robust domain adaptation learning method with possibilistic distribution distance measure. Firstly, the traditional MMD criterion is transformed into a novel possibilistic clustering model to weaken the influence of noisy data, thereby constructing a robust possibilistic distribution distance metric (P-DDM) criterion. Then the robust effectiveness of domain distribution alignment is further improved by a fuzzy entropy regularization term. The proposed P-DDM is in theory proved which be an upper bound of the traditional distribution distance measure method MMD criterion under certain conditions. Therefore, minimizing P-DDM can effectively optimize the MMD objective. Secondly, based on the P-DDM criterion, a robust domain adaptation classifier based on P-DDM (C-PDDM) is proposed, which adopts the Laplacian matrix to preserve the geometric consistency of instances in the source domain and target domain for improving the label propagation performance. At the same time, by maximizing the use of source domain discriminative information to minimize domain discrimination error, the generalization performance of the learning model is further improved. Finally, a large number of experiments and analyses on multiple EEG datasets (i.e., SEED and SEED-IV) show that the proposed method has superior or comparable robustness performance (i.e., has increased by around 10%) in most cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.