Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

The effects of trauma on feedback processing: an MEG study.

Abdulrahman S Sawalma, Christian M Kiefer, Frank Boers, N Jon Shah, Nibal Khudeish, Irene Neuner, Mohammad M Herzallah, Jürgen Dammers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdulrahman S SawalmaInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Christian M KieferInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Frank BoersInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
N Jon ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Nibal KhudeishInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Irene NeunerInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Mohammad M HerzallahPalestinian Neuroscience Initiative, Al-Quds University, Abu Dis, Palestine.
Jürgen DammersInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEAl-Quds University · PSRWTH Aachen University · DEJülich Aachen Research Alliance · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cognitive impact of psychological trauma can manifest as a range of post-traumatic stress symptoms that are often attributed to impairments in learning from positive and negative outcomes, aka reinforcement learning. Research on the impact of trauma on reinforcement learning has mainly been inconclusive. This study aimed to circumscribe the impact of psychological trauma on reinforcement learning in the context of neural response in time and frequency domains. Two groups of participants were tested - those who had experienced psychological trauma and a control group who had not - while they performed a probabilistic classification task that dissociates learning from positive and negative feedback during a magnetoencephalography (MEG) examination. While the exposure to trauma did not exhibit any effects on learning accuracy or response time for positive or negative feedback, MEG cortical activity was modulated in response to positive feedback. In particular, the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortices (mOFC and lOFC) exhibited increased activity, while the insular and supramarginal cortices showed decreased activity during positive feedback presentation. Furthermore, when receiving negative feedback, the trauma group displayed higher activity in the medial portion of the superior frontal cortex. The timing of these activity changes occurred between 160 and 600 ms post feedback presentation. Analysis of the time-frequency domain revealed heightened activity in theta and alpha frequency bands (4-10 Hz) in the lOFC in the trauma group. Moreover, dividing the two groups according to their learning performance, the activity for the non-learner subgroup was found to be lower in lOFC and higher in the supramarginal cortex. These differences were found in the trauma group only. The results highlight the localization and neural dynamics of feedback processing that could be affected by exposure to psychological trauma. This approach and associated findings provide a novel framework for understanding the cognitive correlates of psychological trauma in relation to neural dynamics in the space, time, and frequency domains. Subsequent work will focus on the stratification of cognitive and neural correlates as a function of various symptoms of psychological trauma. Clinically, the study findings and approach open the possibility for neuromodulation interventions that synchronize cognitive and psychological constructs for individualized treatment.

Indexed as

feedback-based learningmagnetoencephalographyPTSDspatio-temporal cluster permutation testtrauma

Identifiers

PMID38027493
PMCPMC10651751
OpenAlexW4388225553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.