Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027221›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2023

PitNETs and the gut microbiota: potential connections, future directions.

Ding Nie, Chuzhong Li, Yazhuo Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ding NieBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chuzhong LiBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yazhuo ZhangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Institute of Neurosurgery · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the gut microbiome has been widely discussed in numerous works of literature. The biggest concern is the association of the gut microbiome with the central nervous system through the microbiome-brain-gut axis in the past ten years. As more and more research has been done on the relationship between the disease of the central nervous system and gut microbes. This fact is being revealed that gut microbes seem to play an important role from the onset and progression of the disease to clinical symptoms, and new treatments. As a special tumor of the central nervous system, pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs)are closely related to metabolism, endocrinology, and immunity. These factors are the vectors through which intestinal microbes interact with the central nervous system. However, little is known about the effects of gut microbes on the PitNET. In this review, the relationship of gut microbiota in PitNETs is introduced, the potential effects of the gut-brain axis in this relationship are analyzed, and future research directions are presented.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeNeuroendocrine TumorsPituitary NeoplasmsBrainCentral Nervous SystemHumansgut-brain axisgut microbiotaintestinal florapituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)pituitary tumor

Identifiers

PMID38027221
PMCPMC10657991
OpenAlexW4388410211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.