ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Interpreting growth hormone and IGF-I results using modern assays and reference ranges for the monitoring of treatment effectiveness in acromegaly.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soluble alpha-klotho as an adjunct biomarker of disease activity in acromegaly: Added value beyond GH and IGF-1.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Thyroid eye disease with teprotumumab-related hyperglycemia associated with increased growth hormone secretion.JCEM case reports · 2026Article
- Acromegaly diagnosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- [Efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel in acromegaly assessed by SAGIT].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Harmonization of IGF1 immunoassays towards a higher-order LC-MS/MS reference anchor.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Article
- From Subtle Signs to Severe Sequelae-A Century of Symptomatology and Comorbidities in the Diagnosis of GH-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Digital Voice Analysis as a Biomarker of Acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Review
- Biochemical Control in a Colombian Cohort of Patients With Acromegaly: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study (2017-2023).Cureus · 2024Article
- The changing landscape of acromegaly - an epidemiological perspective.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024Review
- Pitfalls in the lab assessment of hypopituitarism.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard treatment for acromegaly focuses on the achievement of target absolute levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I). The appropriateness of these targets when measured using modern assay methods is not well defined. This paper reviews biochemical status assessed using methods available at the time and associated clinical outcomes. GH measurements were shown to provide an indication of changes in tumor size, and failure of GH suppression after glucose stimulation is associated with tumor recurrence. IGF-I levels were more closely associated with changes in symptoms and signs. Reduced GH and IGF-I concentrations were shown to be associated with increased longevity, although the degree of increase has only been analyzed for GH. Lowering of GH and IGF-I has consistently been associated with improved outcomes; however, absolute levels reported in previous studies were based on results from methods and reference ranges that are now obsolete. Applying previously described absolute thresholds as targets (e.g. "normal" IGF-I level) when using current methods is best applied to those with active acromegaly symptoms who could benefit from further lowering of biochemical markers. In asymptomatic individuals with mild IGF-I or GH elevations, targeting biochemical "normalization" would result in the need for combination pharmacotherapy in many patients without proven benefit. Measurement of both GH and IGF-I remains an essential component of diagnosis and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment in acromegaly; however, treatment goals based only on previously identified absolute thresholds are not appropriate without taking into account the assay and reference ranges being employed. Treatment goals should be individualized considering biochemical improvement from an untreated baseline, symptoms of disease, risks, burdens and costs of complex treatment regimens, comorbidities, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.