Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38027199›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Interpreting growth hormone and IGF-I results using modern assays and reference ranges for the monitoring of treatment effectiveness in acromegaly.

David R Clemmons, Martin Bidlingmaier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acromegaly diagnosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  4. Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. [Efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel in acromegaly assessed by SAGIT].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Digital Voice Analysis as a Biomarker of Acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  10. Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The changing landscape of acromegaly - an epidemiological perspective.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  13. Pitfalls in the lab assessment of hypopituitarism.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David R ClemmonsDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Martin BidlingmaierNeuroendocrine Unit, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard treatment for acromegaly focuses on the achievement of target absolute levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I). The appropriateness of these targets when measured using modern assay methods is not well defined. This paper reviews biochemical status assessed using methods available at the time and associated clinical outcomes. GH measurements were shown to provide an indication of changes in tumor size, and failure of GH suppression after glucose stimulation is associated with tumor recurrence. IGF-I levels were more closely associated with changes in symptoms and signs. Reduced GH and IGF-I concentrations were shown to be associated with increased longevity, although the degree of increase has only been analyzed for GH. Lowering of GH and IGF-I has consistently been associated with improved outcomes; however, absolute levels reported in previous studies were based on results from methods and reference ranges that are now obsolete. Applying previously described absolute thresholds as targets (e.g. "normal" IGF-I level) when using current methods is best applied to those with active acromegaly symptoms who could benefit from further lowering of biochemical markers. In asymptomatic individuals with mild IGF-I or GH elevations, targeting biochemical "normalization" would result in the need for combination pharmacotherapy in many patients without proven benefit. Measurement of both GH and IGF-I remains an essential component of diagnosis and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment in acromegaly; however, treatment goals based only on previously identified absolute thresholds are not appropriate without taking into account the assay and reference ranges being employed. Treatment goals should be individualized considering biochemical improvement from an untreated baseline, symptoms of disease, risks, burdens and costs of complex treatment regimens, comorbidities, and quality of life.

Indexed as

AcromegalyHuman Growth HormoneGrowth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IQuality of LifeReference ValuesTreatment OutcomeGrowth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor Iacromegalybiochemical markersgrowth hormoneIGF-Itherapytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID38027199
PMCPMC10656675
OpenAlexW4388271046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.