ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2023
Advances in the treatment of autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis, a look towards the repositioning of drugs.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Effectiveness of Secukinumab in Congenital Ichthyoses: A Retrospective Monocentric Case Series.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Topical Treatments for Rare Genetic Dermatological Diseases: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transglutaminase 1 Gene Delivery by Adeno-Associated Virus into Rat and Pig Skin and Safety of ARCI Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Gene Therapies in Dermatological Diseases: A Breakthrough in Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Chronic Dermatoses: From Pathophysiology to Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Cureus · 2025Review
- A novel variant c.7104 + 6T > A ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyoses (ARCI) are a skin pathology due to genetic causes characterized by a variable degree of desquamation, accompanied by erythema. The degree of symptoms is variable, different altered genes are involved, and the symptoms drastically affect patients' quality of life. Topical treatments are a first-choice strategy due to their ease of application and cost; however, enteral administration of retinoids offers greater efficacy, although with certain limitations. Despite the treatment alternatives, ARCI will persist throughout life, disabling people. Therefore, the search for new treatments always remains necessary. Especially repositioning drugs could be a short-term alternative to new affordable treatments for patients. Taking advantage of extensive knowledge of known drugs or biologics could ensure more accessible and possibly lower-cost treatments. This review briefly and concisely addresses possible repositioning strategies with drugs and biologics for ichthyosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.