The influence of general practitioner and patient sex on the treatment of major depression.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Social position and antidepressant dose trajectories: a latent class analysis of a french cohort linked to the reimbursement register.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026
   Article
2. Role of gender, age and rurality in benzodiazepine consumption in Catalonia, 2018-2022: a retrospective longitudinal drug utilisation study.BMJ public health · 2026
   Article
3. Gender differences in psychotropic medication prescribing in a rural area of Catalonia: a community-based observational study.Frontiers in public health · 2026
   Observational
4. Challenge of long-term benzodiazepine use in primary care: insights from a real-world cohort study in Catalonia.Family medicine and community health · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as