Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026797›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2023

Assay validation of saliva glucocorticoids in Columbia spotted frogs and effects of handling and marking.

Brian J Tornabene, Blake R Hossack, Creagh W Breuner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Why not both? A case study in measuring cortisol and corticosterone.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian J TornabeneU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 32 Campus Dr., University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812, USA.
Blake R HossackU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 32 Campus Dr., University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812, USA.
Creagh W BreunerWildlife Biology Program, W. A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, 32 Campus Dr., University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812, USA.
University of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive methods are important to the field of conservation physiology to reduce negative effects on organisms being studied. Glucocorticoid (GC) hormones are often used to assess health of individuals, but collection methods can be invasive. Many amphibians are imperiled worldwide, and saliva is a non- or semi-invasive matrix to measure GCs that has been partially validated for only four amphibian species. Validation ensures that assays are reliable and can detect changes in saliva corticosterone (sCORT) after exposure to stressors, but it is also necessary to ensure sCORT concentrations are correlated with plasma concentrations. To help validate the use of saliva in assessing CORT responses in amphibians, we captured uniquely marked Columbia spotted frogs (

Indexed as

Amphibianconservation physiologyendocrinologyglucocorticoidsnon-invasive methodsstress responses

Identifiers

PMID38026797
PMCPMC10660366
OpenAlexW4387623519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.