Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026639›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Incorporating biodiversity responses to land use change scenarios for preventing emerging zoonotic diseases in areas of unknown host-pathogen interactions.

Fabio de Oliveira Roque, Beatriz Bellón, Angélica Guerra, Francisco Valente-Neto, Cyntia C Santos, Isabel Melo, Adriano Nobre Arcos, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira, André Valle Nunes, Clarissa de Araujo Martins and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Fabio de Oliveira RoqueInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Beatriz BellónBIODIVAG, Univ Angers, Angers, France.
Angélica GuerraInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Francisco Valente-NetoInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Cyntia C SantosInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Isabel MeloInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Adriano Nobre ArcosInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Alessandra Gutierrez de OliveiraInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
André Valle NunesInstituto Nacional de Pesquisa do Pantanal, Programa de Capacitação Institucional, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Clarissa de Araujo MartinsInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Franco L SouzaInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Heitor HerreraUniversidade Católica Dom Bosco, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Sustentabilidade Agropecuária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Luiz Eduardo R TavaresInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Mauricio Almeida-GomesInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Olivier PaysBIODIVAG, Univ Angers, Angers, France.
Pierre-Cyril RenaudBIODIVAG, Univ Angers, Angers, France.
Suellem Petilim Gomes BarriosInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Lisa YonSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Gemma BowsherCentre for Conflict and Health, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Richard SullivanCentre for Conflict and Health, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew JohnsonSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Carlos E V GrelleDepartment of Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Campo Grande, Brazil.
Jose Manuel Ochoa-QuinteroInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRAlexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute · COKing's College London · GBUniversité d'Angers · FRUniversity of Nottingham · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMuseu Paraense Emílio Goeldi · BRRhodes University · ZAUniversidade Católica Dom Bosco · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need to reconcile food production, the safeguarding of nature, and the protection of public health is imperative in a world of continuing global change, particularly in the context of risks of emerging zoonotic disease (EZD). In this paper, we explored potential land use strategies to reduce EZD risks using a landscape approach. We focused on strategies for cases where the dynamics of pathogen transmission among species were poorly known and the ideas of "land-use induced spillover" and "landscape immunity" could be used very broadly. We first modeled three different land-use change scenarios in a region of transition between the Cerrado and the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspots. The land-use strategies used to build our scenarios reflected different proportions of native vegetation cover, as a proxy of habitat availability. We then evaluated the effects of the proportion of native vegetation cover on the occupancy probability of a group of mammal species and analyzed how the different land-use scenarios might affect the distribution of species in the landscape and thus the risk of EZD. We demonstrate that these approaches can help identify potential future EZD risks, and can thus be used as decision-making tools by stakeholders, with direct implications for improving both environmental and socio-economic outcomes.

Indexed as

agricultureCerradoCOVID-19 pandemicland-use planningLCLUCzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID38026639
PMCPMC10665965
OpenAlexW4388615885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.