Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Exploring the benefits of in-diet versus repeated oral dosing of saracatinib (AZD0530) in chronic studies: insights into pharmacokinetics and animal welfare.

Suraj S Vasanthi, Nyzil Massey, Suresh N Nair, Jonathan P Mochel, Lucas Showman, Thimmasettappa Thippeswamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suraj S Vasanthi *Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Nyzil Massey *Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Suresh N NairDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Thrissur, India.
Jonathan P MochelPrecision One Health, Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Lucas ShowmanW.M. Keck Metabolomics Research Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Thimmasettappa ThippeswamyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Iowa State University · USKerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Saracatinib and 1400W Counteract Nerve Agents-Induced Long-Term NeurotoxicityU01NS117284 · NINDS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIPPESWAMY, THIMMASETTAPPA · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS117284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saracatinib/AZD0530 (SAR), a Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mitigates seizure-induced brain pathology in epilepsy models upon repeated oral dosing. However, repeated dosing is stressful and can be challenging in some seizing animals. To overcome this issue, we have incorporated SAR-in-Diet and compared serum pharmacokinetics (PK) and brain concentrations with conventional repeated oral dosing. Saracatinib in solution or in-diet was stable at room temperature for >4 weeks (97 ± 1.56%). Adult Sprague Dawley rats on SAR-in-Diet consumed ~1.7 g/day less compared to regular diet (16.82 ± 0.6 vs. 18.50 ± 0.5 g/day), but the weight gain/day was unaffected (2.63 ± 0.5 g/day vs. 2.83 ± 0.2 g/day). Importantly, we achieved the anticipated SAR dose range from 2.5-18.7 mg/kg of rat in response to varying concentrations of SAR-in-Diet from 54 to 260 ppm of feed, respectively. There was a strong and significant correlation between SAR-in-Diet dose (mg/kg) and serum saracatinib concentrations (ng/ml). Serum concentrations also did not vary significantly between SAR-in-Diet and repeated oral dosing. The hippocampal saracatinib concentrations derived from SAR-in-Diet treatment were higher than those derived after repeated oral dosing (day 3, 546.8 ± 219.7 ng/g vs. 238.6 ± 143 ng/g; day 7, 300.7 ± 43.4 ng/g vs. 271.1 ± 62.33 ng/g). Saracatinib stability at room temperature and high serum and hippocampal concentrations in animals fed on SAR-in-Diet are useful to titer the saracatinib dose for future animal disease models. Overall, test drugs in the diet is an experimental approach that addresses issues related to handling stress-induced variables in animal experiments.

Indexed as

hippocampusLC–MS/MSpharmacokineticssaracatinibserumSrc tyrosine kinases

Identifiers

PMID38026620
PMCPMC10666625
OpenAlexW4388636059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.