Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026595›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

The Perception of Spectacles Use Among the General Population in Ha'il Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Nawaf Osaywid Alrashidi, Wafy Abdulrahman Albrak, Shaker Osaywid Alreshidi, Lama Abdulrahman Alaradi, Hatim Adam Nagi Adam, Naif Mamdouh Alali, Faris Hashem, Hani Basher Albalawi, Ahmed Yousef Alothman, Shaima Sulaiman Alharbi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Prevalence of Spectacle Non-Adaptation Among Patients Presenting at a Private Practice in Witbank, South Africa.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nawaf Osaywid AlrashidiCollege of Medicine, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0008-7088-0775
Wafy Abdulrahman AlbrakCollege of Medicine, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Shaker Osaywid AlreshidiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Lama Abdulrahman AlaradiDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Hatim Adam Nagi AdamDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Naif Mamdouh AlaliDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Faris HashemDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8817-1095
Hani Basher AlbalawiDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Yousef AlothmanOphthalmology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Shaima Sulaiman AlharbiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
University of Ha'il · SAUniversity of Tabuk · SAMajmaah University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to assess the perception of optical spectacles use among the Ha'il region population in Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed via various social media applications to the residents of the Ha'il region. An online questionnaire was designed and included informed consent and questions assessing the participants' perceptions about wearing eyeglasses, contact lenses, and general eye health. Results: 32.4% of the participants think that long-term eyeglasses wearing worsens vision, and 43% think eyeglasses wearing improves vision. 75.2% believe that long-term use of glasses could cause lifetime dependency on eyeglasses. Regarding contact lenses, 45.9% believe that long-term wearing worsens vision, and 24.1% think long-term wearing of contact lenses improves vision. 60% think long-term use of lenses causes lifetime dependency on those contact lenses. Conclusion: Our results highlighted the misconceptions among the study population regarding wearing prescribed eyeglasses and contact lenses. Thus, education programs and media are warranted to correct the misconceptions about spectacles and raise the awareness about refractive errors and treatment options.

Indexed as

contact lenseseyeglassesrefractive errorsvision impairment

Identifiers

PMID38026595
PMCPMC10680458
OpenAlexW4388923614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.