Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026585›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2023

Patient and caregiver return to work after a primary brain tumor.

Emma Nicklin, Isaac Phang, Susan C Short, Petra Hoogendoorn, Florien W Boele

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma NicklinLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-8098
Isaac PhangLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-3043
Susan C ShortLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-7256
Petra HoogendoornLeiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-648X
Florien W BoeleLeeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0409-7949
University of Leeds · GBLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studies focusing on the return to work (RTW) experiences of patients with a brain tumor (BT) are scarce. We aimed to explore, in-depth, the occupational expectations, experiences, and satisfaction of patients who RTW after a BT diagnosis and treatment, those not able to, and their family caregivers. Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional study utilized semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. Interviews were conducted with adults diagnosed with primary BT, in employment/self-employed before diagnosis, currently in follow-up care, and also with their caregivers. Results: In total, 23 interviews (17 patients/6 caregivers) took place. Five themes were developed: (1) Early (adjustments and) expectations: "Thought I would be back at work the following Monday"; pre-treatment patients wanted to be better informed about potential recovery time and side-effects. (2) Drivers to RTW: "Getting my life back on track"; RTW was seen as a symbol of normality and also dictated by financial pressures. (3) Experiences returning to work: "It's had its ups and downs": patients who had successfully returned were supported by employers financially, emotionally, and practically. (4) Required support: "He had surgery and that was it": suggested support included a back-to-work scheme and comprehensive financial support. (5) Caring and paid work: The "juggling act": carer's work was significantly impacted; often reducing/increasing their working hours while managing increasing caring demands. Conclusions: Future research focusing on RTW in neuro-oncology populations is needed. Interventions should be developed to improve employer/employee communication, and increase knowledge about BT care and possibilities for RTW, to support patients and caregivers towards sustained employment.

Indexed as

brain tumorcaregiversqualitative researchreturn to worksurgery

Identifiers

PMID38026585
PMCPMC10666801
OpenAlexW4384825880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.