Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026575›Full record

ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2023

Impacts of accreditation on the performance of primary health care centres: A systematic review.

Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi, Atefeh As'habi, Maryam Nazari, Masoumeh Ebrahimi Tavani, Mehdi Haghi, Farid Gharibi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Looking back at 2025: Strengthening primary care evidence for Malaysia, regional partners, and the global health community.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jafar Sadegh TabriziMD, PhD, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Atefeh As'habiBSc, MSc, PhD, Food Safety Research Center (salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iram.
Maryam NazariBSc, MSc, PhD, Food Safety Research Center (salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iram.
Masoumeh Ebrahimi TavaniBSc, MSc, MPH, PhD, Quality Improvement, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Center of Health Network Management, Deputy of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi HaghiBSc, MSc, PhD, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Health and Nutrition, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Farid GharibiBSc, MSc, PhD, Social Determinants of Health Research Centers, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. Email: gharibihsa@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence on the impacts of accreditation on primary health care (PHC) services is inconsistent. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impacts of accreditation on the performance of PHC centres. Method: This study systematically reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2019 in the Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, PubMed and ProQuest. The following keywords were used: ((primary care OR primary health care) AND (accreditation) AND (impact OR effect OR output OR outcome OR influence OR result OR consequences)). The database search yielded a total of41256 articles, among which 30 articles were finally included in the review. Results: Accreditation showed the most positive impacts on the quality, effectiveness, human resource management and strategic management of PHC services. Accreditation also positively affected safety, responsiveness, accessibility, customer satisfaction, documentation, leadership, efficiency and continuity of care. Few negative impacts were noted, including the possibility of accreditation being used as a bureaucratic tool, high cost of acquiring accreditation, difficulties in understanding the accreditation process, high staff turnover rate in accredited PHC centres and weak sustainability of some accreditation programmes. Conclusion: Given its numerous positive impacts, accreditation could be used to effectively improve the performance of PHC centres.

Indexed as

AccreditationPerformancePrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID38026575
PMCPMC10664760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.