Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026471›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

Making the Genotypic Variation Visible: Hyperspectral Phenotyping in Scots Pine Seedlings.

Jan Stejskal, Jaroslav Čepl, Eva Neuwirthová, Olusegun Olaitan Akinyemi, Jiří Chuchlík, Daniel Provazník, Markku Keinänen, Petya Campbell, Jana Albrechtová, Milan Lstibůrek and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan StejskalDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-5477
Jaroslav ČeplDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2057-3442
Eva NeuwirthováDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5613-847X
Olusegun Olaitan AkinyemiDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2005-7576
Jiří ChuchlíkDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6433-1883
Daniel ProvazníkDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-9928
Markku KeinänenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-5520
Petya CampbellDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-4951
Jana AlbrechtováDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6912-1992
Milan LstibůrekDepartment of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6304-6669
Zuzana LhotákováDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-641X
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZCharles University · CZUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIGoddard Space Flight Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperspectral reflectance contains valuable information about leaf functional traits, which can indicate a plant's physiological status. Therefore, using hyperspectral reflectance for high-throughput phenotyping of foliar traits could be a powerful tool for tree breeders and nursery practitioners to distinguish and select seedlings with desired adaptation potential to local environments. We evaluated the use of 2 nondestructive methods (i.e., leaf and proximal/canopy) measuring hyperspectral reflectance in the 350- to 2,500-nm range for phenotyping on 1,788 individual Scots pine seedlings belonging to lowland and upland ecotypes of 3 different local populations from the Czech Republic. Leaf-level measurements were collected using a spectroradiometer and a contact probe with an internal light source to measure the biconical reflectance factor of a sample of needles placed on a black background in the contact probe field of view. The proximal canopy measurements were collected under natural solar light, using the same spectroradiometer with fiber optical cable to collect data on individual seedlings' hemispherical conical reflectance factor. The latter method was highly susceptible to changes in incoming radiation. Both spectral datasets showed statistically significant differences among Scots pine populations in the whole spectral range. Moreover, using random forest and support vector machine learning algorithms, the proximal data obtained from the top of the seedlings offered up to 83% accuracy in predicting 3 different Scots pine populations. We conclude that both approaches are viable for hyperspectral phenotyping to disentangle the phenotypic and the underlying genetic variation within Scots pine seedlings.

Identifiers

PMID38026471
PMCPMC10644830
OpenAlexW4387653119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.