ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Disability risk prediction model based on machine learning among Chinese healthy older adults: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Disability risk prediction models in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning Classification of Current Functional Impairment in Older Adults with Diabetes: Evidence from CHARLS 2015.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Functional disability screening in the elderly: a machine learning approach with ELSI-Brazil data.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Multidimensional Health Decline Prediction Framework: Data-Driven Modeling for the Middle-Aged and Elderly Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for three-tier disability risk stratification in older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Disability Risk Prediction Model for Older Adults Based on Machine Learning: A Multi-Algorithm Comparison with SHAP Interpretation.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Associations of inflammation-related hematological profile with the early-stages of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and the mediating role of body composition: evidence from the China National Health Survey.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Identifying liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: an interpretable machine learning algorithm based on LSM.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for meningoencephalitis in pediatric scrub typhus based on machine learning algorithms.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Dynamic fall risk prediction in hospitalized cancer patients: development and validation of a machine learning model using multidimensional clinical data to overcome over-sensitivity in traditional scales.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting early liver metastasis after pancreatic cancer surgery.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Development of a neural network-based risk prediction model for mild cognitive impairment in older adults with functional disability.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a new diagnostic prediction model for NAFLD based on machine learning algorithms in NHANES 2017-2020.3.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2025Article
- Construction of disability risk prediction model for the elderly based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of a Longitudinal Model for Disability Prediction in Older Adults in China: Analysis of CHARLS Data (2015-2020).JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based reconstruction of prognostic staging for gastric cancer patients with different differentiation grades: A multicenter retrospective study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of machine learning-based predictive model for colorectal polyp recurrence one year after endoscopic mucosal resection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for predicting the risk of vaginal laxity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Incremental predictive value of intrinsic capacity and environmental characteristics in the risk prediction of incident disability.JAR life · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Predicting disability risk in healthy older adults in China is essential for timely preventive interventions, improving their quality of life, and providing scientific evidence for disability prevention. Therefore, developing a machine learning model capable of evaluating disability risk based on longitudinal research data is crucial. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 2,175 older adults enrolled in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2015 and 2018 to develop and validate this prediction model. Several machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, multilayer perceptron, random forest, and XGBoost) were used to assess the 3-year risk of developing disability. The optimal cutoff points and adjustment parameters are explored in the training set, the prediction accuracy of the models is compared in the testing set, and the best-performing models are further interpreted. Results: During a 3-year follow-up period, a total of 505 (23.22%) healthy older adult individuals developed disabilities. Among the 43 features examined, the LASSO regression identified 11 features as significant for model establishment. When comparing six different machine learning models on the testing set, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance across various evaluation metrics, including the highest area under the ROC curve (0.803), accuracy (0.757), sensitivity (0.790), and F1 score (0.789), while its specificity was 0.712. The decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated showed that XGBoost had the highest net benefit in most of the threshold ranges. Based on the importance of features determined by SHAP (model interpretation method), the top five important features were identified as right-hand grip strength, depressive symptoms, marital status, respiratory function, and age. Moreover, the SHAP summary plot was used to illustrate the positive or negative effects attributed to the features influenced by XGBoost. The SHAP dependence plot explained how individual features affected the output of the predictive model. Conclusion: Machine learning-based prediction models can accurately evaluate the likelihood of disability in healthy older adults over a period of 3 years. A combination of XGBoost and SHAP can provide clear explanations for personalized risk prediction and offer a more intuitive understanding of the effect of key features in the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.