Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026309›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Disability risk prediction model based on machine learning among Chinese healthy older adults: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.

Yuchen Han, Shaobing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuchen HanSchool of Public Health, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Shaobing WangSchool of Public Health, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predicting disability risk in healthy older adults in China is essential for timely preventive interventions, improving their quality of life, and providing scientific evidence for disability prevention. Therefore, developing a machine learning model capable of evaluating disability risk based on longitudinal research data is crucial. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 2,175 older adults enrolled in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2015 and 2018 to develop and validate this prediction model. Several machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, multilayer perceptron, random forest, and XGBoost) were used to assess the 3-year risk of developing disability. The optimal cutoff points and adjustment parameters are explored in the training set, the prediction accuracy of the models is compared in the testing set, and the best-performing models are further interpreted. Results: During a 3-year follow-up period, a total of 505 (23.22%) healthy older adult individuals developed disabilities. Among the 43 features examined, the LASSO regression identified 11 features as significant for model establishment. When comparing six different machine learning models on the testing set, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance across various evaluation metrics, including the highest area under the ROC curve (0.803), accuracy (0.757), sensitivity (0.790), and F1 score (0.789), while its specificity was 0.712. The decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated showed that XGBoost had the highest net benefit in most of the threshold ranges. Based on the importance of features determined by SHAP (model interpretation method), the top five important features were identified as right-hand grip strength, depressive symptoms, marital status, respiratory function, and age. Moreover, the SHAP summary plot was used to illustrate the positive or negative effects attributed to the features influenced by XGBoost. The SHAP dependence plot explained how individual features affected the output of the predictive model. Conclusion: Machine learning-based prediction models can accurately evaluate the likelihood of disability in healthy older adults over a period of 3 years. A combination of XGBoost and SHAP can provide clear explanations for personalized risk prediction and offer a more intuitive understanding of the effect of key features in the model.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationRisk AssessmentAgedBayes TheoremChinaEast Asian PeopleHand StrengthHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningProspective StudiesQuality of LifeChina Longitudinal Studydisabilitymachine learningolder adultsprediction model

Identifiers

PMID38026309
PMCPMC10665855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.