Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026305›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Measure what matters: considerations for outcome measurement of care coordination for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and medical complexity.

Dércia Materula, Genevieve Currie, Xiao Yang Jia, Brittany Finlay, Catherine Richard, Meridith Yohemas, Gina Lachuk, Myka Estes, Tammie Dewan, Sarah MacEachern and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dércia MaterulaSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Genevieve CurrieSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Xiao Yang JiaSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Brittany FinlaySchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Catherine RichardAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Meridith YohemasAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gina LachukAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Myka EstesAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tammie DewanAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sarah MacEachernAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nadine GallAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ben GibbardAlberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jennifer D ZwickerSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Care Coordination (CC) is a significant intervention to enhance family's capacity in caring for children with neurodevelopmental disability and medical complexity (NDD-MC). CC assists with integration of medical and behavioral care and services, partnerships with medical and community-based supports, and access to medical, behavioral, and educational supports and services. Although there is some consensus on the principles that characterize optimal CC for children with NDD-MC, challenges remain in measuring and quantifying the impacts of CC related to these principles. Two key challenges include: (1) identification of measures that capture CC impacts from the medical system, care provider, and family perspectives; and (2) recognition of the important community context outside of a hospital or clinical setting. Methods: This study used a multilevel model variant of the triangulation mixed methods design to assess the impact of a CC project implemented in Alberta, Canada, on family quality of life, resource use, and care integration at the broader environmental and household levels. At the broader environmental level, we used linked administrative data. At the household level we used quantitative pre-post survey datasets, and aggregate findings from qualitative interviews to measure group-level impacts and an embedded multiple-case design to draw comparisons, capture the nuances of children with NDD-MC and their families, and expand on factors driving the high variability in outcome measures. Three theoretical propositions formed the basis of the analytical strategy for our case study evidence to explore factors affecting the high variability in outcome measures. Discussion: This study expanded on the factors used to measure the outcomes of CC and adds to our understanding of how CC as an intervention impacts resource use, quality of life, and care integration of children with NDD-MC and their families. Given the heterogeneous nature of this population, evaluation studies that account for the variable and multi-level impacts of CC interventions are critical to inform practice, implementation, and policy of CC for children with NDD-MC.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesQuality of LifeCanadaChildConsensusHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Carecare coordinationcaregiverschildrenmedical complexityneurodevelopmental disordersquality of liferesource utilization

Identifiers

PMID38026305
PMCPMC10656699
OpenAlexW4388289817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.