ArticleiScience2023
MIRS: An AI scoring system for predicting the prognosis and therapy of breast cancer.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence research in critical illness: a quantitative approach and visualization study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The neuroimmune axis in breast cancer: from mechanistic insights to clinical applications.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- Modern Personalized Strategies for Breast Cancer Treatment: Bridging Precision Oncology and Psycho-Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing: A Review of Its Transformative Impact on Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Resistance Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Role of Non-Coding Regions in Breast Cancer: From Gene Regulation to Therapeutic Implications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and metastasis are crucial characteristics for tumorigenesis. However, the potential role of their combination in breast cancer (BRCA) remains elusive. Herein, on the basis of quantifying TIICs and tumor metastasis together, we established a precise prognostic scoring system named metastatic and immunogenomic risk score (MIRS) using a neural network model. MIRS showed better performance when compared with other published signatures. MIRS stratifies patients into a high risk subtype (MIRS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.