Annual changes of

Rosso Anahi, Freudenthal Ramiro

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rosso AnahiLaboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Institute of Biosciences, Biotechnology, and translational Biology (iB3), Department of Physiology Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Buenos Aires/CONICET, Ciudad autónoma de Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina.

Freudenthal RamiroLaboratory of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory, Institute of Biosciences, Biotechnology, and translational Biology (iB3), Department of Physiology Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Buenos Aires/CONICET, Ciudad autónoma de Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neohelice is a long-standing model for memory studies for its strong retention of a reduced escape response when trained to iterative presentations of a visual danger stimulus (VDS). Here we present year-round changes that are related to the memory acquisition, storage, and expression. First, we evaluated exploratory activity and response to the VDS, as necessary for memory acquisition and expression. Both parameters change year-round. Second, short-term memory (STM) and two types of long-term memory (LTM) were assessed throughout the year. STM and long-term context-dependent signal memory (CSM) change between periods of the year, whereas signal memory (SM) does not, indicating that the cognitive abilities of the crab display circannual rhythms. Third, during the reproductive period, STM retention is higher than both CSM and SM, indicating a trade-off between STM and LTM. This is the first report of memory retention abilities changing seasonally as a trade-off between short- and long-term memories.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesEvolutionary biologyMemory retentionZoology

Identifiers

PMID38026154

DOI10.1016/j.isci.2023.108161

PMCPMC10660089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.