Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026132›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2023

Living with food allergies: the experiences of adult patients and caregivers.

Alexandra F Santos, Margitta Worm, Shoko Kurita, Tania Wong, Davide Contato, Elia Pirillo, A Esther Esteban, Paolo Tassinari, Flavia Perna, R Sharon Chinthrajah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hazelnut oral immunotherapy in children: An Italian single-center retrospective cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Global Survey of Mental Health Treatment Experiences Among Food Allergy Patients and Caregivers.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexandra F Santos *Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Margitta Worm *Division of Allergology and Dermatology, Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Shoko KuritaJapanese Mother's Society for Allergy Care (JMSAC), Kanagawa, Japan.
Tania WongAllergy & Anaphylaxis Australia, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia.
Davide ContatoFood Allergy Italia, Padua, Italy.
Elia PirilloFood Allergy Italia, Padua, Italy.
A Esther EstebanSpanish Association for People with Food and Latex Allergy (AEPNAA), Madrid, Spain.
Paolo TassinariNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Flavia PernaNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
R Sharon Chinthrajah *Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEvelina London Children's Healthcare · GBStanford University · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902018Medical Research Council MR/M008517/1Medical Research Council MR/T032081/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few studies have addressed how food allergy may impact differently on the daily lives of adults with food allergies and caregivers for food-allergic dependents. Objective: To explore similarities and differences in life experiences and unmet needs between individuals caring for a child with food allergy and adults with food allergy world-wide. Methods: Two multinational, virtual, interactive, moderated discussions of specific questions between respectively people with food allergies and caregivers for people with food allergies, with experienced clinicians participating. Results: Sixteen individuals living with food allergies and nine caregivers took part in the two roundtables. Food avoidance and antihistamines were the most common treatments for food-allergic reactions in both groups. Caregivers reported greater burden of disease on affected individuals and families than did adult patients. Adult panelists considered autoinjectors easy to use but caregivers reported additional emotional stress thinking about autoinjector use. Caregivers described an ever-present fear of inattention and of overlooking a risk factor for a severe reaction, whereas adult panelists showed a determination not to let their food allergies interfere with living their lives. Both groups had safety-conscious attitudes to treatments, but adult patients emphasized convenience while caregivers prioritized reduced severity of reactions and eliminated fear. Both groups confirmed the need for improved, trusted sources of information, and for resources and training programs for any new therapies. Conclusion: The interactive exchange provided insights into differences between adult patients and caregivers, notably in fear and confidence in daily life, severity of disease impact, and unmet needs for treatments.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisdisease life experienceinteractive dialoguemode of action (MOA)quality of life

Identifiers

PMID38026132
PMCPMC10658712
OpenAlexW4388440855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.