Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026102›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2023

Peptic ulcer disease burden, trends, and inequalities in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a population-based study.

Zhongmian Zhang, Weitian Yan, Xiyan Zhang, Jiaqi Wang, Zhonghan Zhang, Zili Lin, Lan Wang, Jiaqin Chen, Daming Liu, Wen Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effects ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongmian ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Weitian YanDepartment of Rheumatology, Yunnan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
Xiyan ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiaqi WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhonghan ZhangCollege of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Zili LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Lan WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiaqin ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Daming LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang Hutong, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang Hutong, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhihong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 5 Haiyuncang Hutong, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100700, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-131X
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CNYunnan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peptic ulcer disease has been a major threat to the world's population, which remains a significant cause of hospitalization worldwide and healthcare resource utilization. Objectives: We aimed to describe the global burden, trends, and inequalities of peptic ulcer disease. Design: An observational study was conducted. Methods: In this secondary analysis of the Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019, we extracted data for age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs), disability-adjusted life year rates (ASDRs), and mortality rates (ASMRs); then, we stratified by age, level of regionals, and country; subsequently, we calculated estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) of ASIR, ASDR, ASMR, and quantified cross-country inequalities in peptic ulcer disease mortality. Results: Globally, ASIR showed a continuous downward trend, from 63.84 in 1990 to 44.26 per 100,000 population in 2019, with an annual decrease of 1.42% [EAPC = -1.42 (95% CI: -1.55 to -1.29)]. ASDR showed a continuing downward trend, and the EAPC was -3.47% (-3.58 to -3.37). ASMR showed a persistent decline, declining by nearly half in 2019 compared to 1990 (3.0 Conclusion: Global peptic ulcer disease morbidity and mortality rates decreased significantly from 1990 to 2019. These health gains were in accordance with a substantial reduction in the magnitude of SDI-related inequalities across countries, which is paired with overall socioeconomic and health improvements observed in the region.

Indexed as

age-standardized DALYs ratesage-standardized incidence ratesage-standardized mortality ratesGlobal Burden of Diseaseinequalitiespeptic ulcer disease

Identifiers

PMID38026102
PMCPMC10647969
OpenAlexW4388677150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.