Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026068›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2023

Priority Outcomes in Sickle Cell Disease Treatment: Co-Creation and Implementation of a Preference Exercise With Patients and Caregivers to Inform Drug Development.

Maggie Jalowsky, Brett Hauber, Mariah Jacqueline Scott, Steven Arkin, Joshua R Coulter, Stephen J Watt, L Mariah G Kelly, Ashley Valentine

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maggie JalowskySick Cells, Washington, DC, USA.
Brett HauberPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-7268
Mariah Jacqueline ScottSick Cells, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Steven ArkinPfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joshua R CoulterPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Stephen J WattPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
L Mariah G KellyPfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ashley ValentineSick Cells, Washington, DC, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involving patients as co-leaders and co-creators in research is key to reflecting the patient's voice in decision-making. However, co-creation of patient-centered data to inform decisions is rare, especially in early drug development where patient input is critical to prioritizing patient-relevant outcomes and endpoints for use in clinical trials. Despite the industry's growing commitment to patient centricity, most patients are excluded from sharing their expertise in research; more inclusive methods of engaging patients as research partners are needed. We describe a collaboration between a pharmaceutical company and a patient organization in co-leading and co-creating a program to understand priorities of patients and caregivers for treatment features and outcomes in sickle cell disease to inform endpoint selection in clinical development. The results of this program will be used as a basis for continued interaction between patients and the sponsor and to inform ongoing clinical development and evidence-generation activities. This case study demonstrates an approach to meaningful collaborations between patient organizations and pharmaceutical companies aimed at including the patient's voice early in the medical product lifecycle.

Indexed as

community engagementmedical decision-makingmedications/adherencepatient engagementpatient perspectives/narrativesquantitative methodssurvey data

Identifiers

PMID38026068
PMCPMC10652801
OpenAlexW4388708690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.