Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38026022›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Soil as a transdisciplinary research catalyst: from bioprospecting to biorespecting.

Matthew J Tarnowski, Gilda Varliero, Jim Scown, Emily Phelps, Thomas E Gorochowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew J TarnowskiSchool of Biological Science, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1640-2181
Gilda VarlieroRhizosphere Processes Group, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Jim ScownHumanities and Social Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Emily PhelpsSchool of Biological Science, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Thomas E GorochowskiSchool of Biological Science, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-786X
University of Bristol · GBSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast microbial biodiversity of soils is beginning to be observed and understood by applying modern DNA sequencing techniques. However, ensuring this potentially valuable information is used in a fair and equitable way remains a challenge. Here, we present a public engagement project that explores this topic through collaborative research of soil microbiomes at six urban locations using nanopore-based DNA sequencing. The project brought together researchers from the disciplines of synthetic biology, environmental humanities and microbial ecology, as well as school students aged 14-16 years old, to gain a broader understanding of views on the use of data from the environment. Discussions led to the transformation of 'bioprospecting', a metaphor with extractive connotations which is often used to frame environmental DNA sequencing studies, towards a more collaborative approach-'biorespecting'. This shift in terminology acknowledges that genetic information contained in soil arises as a result of entire ecosystems, including the people involved in its creation. Therefore, any use of sequence information should be accountable to the ecosystems from which it arose. As knowledge can arise from ecosystems and communities, science and technology should acknowledge this link and reciprocate with care and benefit-sharing to help improve the wellbeing of future generations.

Indexed as

metagenomicsmetaphorpublic engagementsoilsynthetic biologytransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID38026022
PMCPMC10646459
OpenAlexW4388706148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.