Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025953›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2023

A generalized deep learning model for heart failure diagnosis using dynamic and static ultrasound.

Zeye Liu, Yuan Huang, Hang Li, Wenchao Li, Fengwen Zhang, Wenbin Ouyang, Shouzheng Wang, Zhiling Luo, Jinduo Wang, Yan Chen and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prospects for the application of artificial intelligence in geriatrics.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Zeye LiuDepartment of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Yuan HuangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Hang LiDepartment of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Wenchao LiZhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Huazhong Fuwai Hospital, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China.
Fengwen ZhangDepartment of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Wenbin OuyangDepartment of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Shouzheng WangDepartment of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Zhiling LuoDepartment of Echocardiography, Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China.
Jinduo WangUniversity of Science and Technology of China, School of Cyber Science and Technology, Hefei 230000, Anhui Province, China.
Yan ChenUniversity of Science and Technology of China, School of Cyber Science and Technology, Hefei 230000, Anhui Province, China.
Ruibing XiaDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich D-80539, Germany.
Yakun LiLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Xiangbin PanDepartment of Structural Heart Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5304-3043
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLFuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital · CNLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Echocardiography (ECG) is the most common method used to diagnose heart failure (HF). However, its accuracy relies on the experience of the operator. Additionally, the video format of the data makes it challenging for patients to bring them to referrals and reexaminations. Therefore, this study used a deep learning approach to assist physicians in assessing cardiac function to promote the standardization of echocardiographic findings and compatibility of dynamic and static ultrasound data. Methods: A deep spatio-temporal convolutional model r2plus1d-Pan (trained on dynamic data and applied to static data) was improved and trained using the idea of "regression training combined with classification application," which can be generalized to dynamic ECG and static cardiac ultrasound views to identify HF with a reduced ejection fraction (EF < 40%). Additionally, three independent datasets containing 8976 cardiac ultrasound views and 10085 cardiac ultrasound videos were established. Subsequently, a multinational, multi-center dataset of EF was labeled. Furthermore, model training and independent validation were performed. Finally, 15 registered ultrasonographers and cardiologists with different working years in three regional hospitals specialized in cardiovascular disease were recruited to compare the results. Results: The proposed deep spatio-temporal convolutional model achieved an area under the receiveroperating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.947 to 0.953) on the training set of dynamic ultrasound data and an AUC of 1 (95% CI, 1 to 1) on the independent validation set. Subsequently, the model was applied to the static cardiac ultrasound view (validation set) with simultaneous input of 1, 2, 4, and 8 images of the same heart, with classification accuracies of 85%, 81%, 93%, and 92%, respectively. On the static data, the classification accuracy of the artificial intelligence (AI) model was comparable with the best performance of ultrasonographers and cardiologists with more than 3 working years (P = 0.344), but significantly better than the median level ( Conclusion: A new deep spatio-temporal convolution model was constructed to identify patients with HF with reduced EF accurately (< 40%) using dynamic and static cardiac ultrasound images. The model outperformed the diagnostic performance of most senior specialists. This may be the first HF-related AI diagnostic model compatible with multi-dimensional cardiac ultrasound data, and may thereby contribute to the improvement of HF diagnosis. Additionally, the model enables patients to carry "on-the-go" static ultrasound reports for referral and reexamination, thus saving healthcare resources.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningechocardiographyheart failuremulti-center cross-sectional study

Identifiers

PMID38025953
PMCPMC10680380
OpenAlexW4388050958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.