Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025834›Full record

ArticleBiomedical reports2023

Diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter on ultrasound for the detection of increased intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.

Weiting Chen, Xia Zhang, Xiuxiu Ye, Pan Ying

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weiting ChenDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Unit, The First People's Hospital of Linhai, Taizhou, Zhejiang 317000, P.R. China.
Xia ZhangDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Unit, The First People's Hospital of Linhai, Taizhou, Zhejiang 317000, P.R. China.
Xiuxiu YeDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Unit, The First People's Hospital of Linhai, Taizhou, Zhejiang 317000, P.R. China.
Pan YingDepartment of Emergency, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang 318020, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timely diagnosis and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) reduces morbidity rates and prevents mortality. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) vs. standard invasive ICP measurements in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies including adult patients with TBI with suspected elevated ICP, and the sonographic ONSD measurements were compared with those from a standard invasive method. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool by two independent authors. A bivariate random effects model was used to summarize the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A total of eight prospective studies with 222 patients with TBI were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.88], the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.90) and the DOR was 17.75 (95% CI, 7.02-44.83) with partial evidence of heterogeneity. The accuracy of the area under the summary ROC was 0.87. An ultrasound-determined elevated ICP has reasonable performance indicators with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with TBI. As such, this method may be a useful complementary monitoring tool in acute care.

Indexed as

intracranial pressureoptic nerve sheath diametertraumatic brain injuryultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38025834
PMCPMC10646761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.