ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports2023
Brain Representation of Animal and Non-Animal Images in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In early Alzheimer's disease (AD), high-level visual functions and processing speed are impacted. Few functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have investigated high-level visual deficits in AD, yet none have explored brain activity patterns during rapid animal/non-animal categorization tasks. Objective: To address this, we utilized the previously known Integrated Cognitive Assessment (ICA) to collect fMRI data and compare healthy controls (HC) to individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild AD. Methods: The ICA encompasses a rapid visual categorization task that involves distinguishing between animals and non-animals within natural scenes. To comprehensively explore variations in brain activity levels and patterns, we conducted both univariate and multivariate analyses of fMRI data. Results: The ICA task elicited activation across a range of brain regions, encompassing the temporal, parietal, occipital, and frontal lobes. Univariate analysis, which compared responses to animal versus non-animal stimuli, showed no significant differences in the regions of interest (ROIs) across all groups, with the exception of the left anterior supramarginal gyrus in the HC group. In contrast, multivariate analysis revealed that in both HC and MCI groups, several regions could differentiate between animals and non-animals based on distinct patterns of activity. Notably, such differentiation was absent within the mild AD group. Conclusions: Our study highlights the ICA task's potential as a valuable cognitive assessment tool designed for MCI and AD. Additionally, our use of fMRI pattern analysis provides valuable insights into the complex changes in brain function associated with AD. This approach holds promise for enhancing our understanding of the disease's progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.