ArticleiScience2023
Psychophysical measurement of perceived motion flow of naturalistic scenes.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Human-like monocular depth biases in deep neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Optical material properties affect detection of deformation of non-rigid rotating objects, but only slightly.Journal of vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neural and computational mechanisms underlying visual motion perception have been extensively investigated over several decades, but little attempt has been made to measure and analyze, how human observers perceive the map of motion vectors, or optical flow, in complex naturalistic scenes. Here, we developed a psychophysical method to assess human-perceived motion flows using local vector matching and a flash probe. The estimated perceived flow for naturalistic movies agreed with the physically correct flow (ground truth) at many points, but also showed consistent deviations from the ground truth (flow illusions) at other points. Comparisons with the predictions of various computational models, including cutting-edge computer vision algorithms and coordinate transformation models, indicated that some flow illusions are attributable to lower-level factors such as spatiotemporal pooling and signal loss, while others reflect higher-level computations, including vector decomposition. Our study demonstrates a promising data-driven psychophysical paradigm for an advanced understanding of visual motion perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.