ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
The Incidence of Retained Objects in Intraoperative X-rays for Missing Counts in Plastic Surgery: We Should Do Better.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the event of incorrect surgical counts, obtaining X-rays to rule out retained surgical items (RSI) is standard practice. However, these safeguards also carry risk. This study investigates the actual incidence of RSI in plastic reconstructive surgery (PRS) cases as measured on intraoperative X-rays and its associated modifiable risk factors. Methods: X-rays with indication of "foreign body" in PRS procedures from 2012 to 2022 were obtained. Reports with "incorrect surgical counts" and associated perioperative records were retrospectively analyzed to determine the incidence of retained surgical items. Results: Among 257 X-rays, 21.4% indicated incorrect counts during PRS operations. None were positive for RSIs. The average number of staff present was 12.01. This correlated to an average of 6.98 staff turnovers. The average case lasted 8.42 hours. X-rays prolonged the time under anesthesia by an average of 24.3 minutes. Free flap surgery had 49.1% prevalence of missing counts (lower extremity 25.5%, breast 20%, craniofacial 3.6%), followed by hand (14.5%), breast (10.9%), abdominal reconstruction (10.9%), craniofacial (9.1%), and cosmetic (5.4%). Conclusions: Although X-rays for incorrect counts intend to prevent catastrophic sequela of inadvertent RSIs, our results suggest the true incidence of RSI in PRS is negligible. However, intraoperative X-rays have potentially detrimental and pervasive consequences for patients, including increased anesthesia time, radiation exposure, and higher overall cost. Addressing modifiable risk factors to minimize unnecessary intraoperative X-rays is imperative while also considering whether this modality is an effective and appropriate tool in PRS procedures with incorrect surgical counts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.