Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025559›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Intrathecal 1% 2-chlorprocaine for short gynecological day care procedures: Prospective, randomized, dose finding study.

Jaya Choudhary, Priyanka Bhojwani, Anshika Agarwal, Amiya Kumar Mishra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaya ChoudharyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medica Superspecialty, Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Priyanka BhojwaniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medica Superspecialty, Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Anshika AgarwalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medica Superspecialty, Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Amiya Kumar MishraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medica Superspecialty, Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Creative Commons · USNethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Establishing the optimum dose of intrathecal 1% 2-chlorprocaine may reduce the discharge time and encourage more widespread use of spinal anesthesia for day care procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and recovery characteristics of three different doses of intrathecal 1% 2-chlorprocaine for short gynecological day care procedures. Material and Methods: Fifty-one patients scheduled for elective day care gynecological procedures lasting less than 60 min and were randomly divided into three groups of 17 each to receive 35 mg, 40 mg, or 45 mg intrathecal 1% 2-chlorprocaine. Demographic data, time required to achieve readiness for surgery, time required to attain discharge criteria, maximum block height achieved, and adverse effects were recorded in each group. Results: The time required to achieve readiness for surgery was similar between the three groups ( Conclusion: The 35 mg intrathecal 1% 2-chlorprocaine not only provides reliable anesthesia for short gynecological procedures but also facilitates faster achievement of the discharge parameters as compared with the 40 mg and 45 mg doses.

Indexed as

1% 2-Chlorprocaineambulatory surgerygynecological day care proceduresmodified PADSS

Identifiers

PMID38025559
PMCPMC10661635
OpenAlexW4387166402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.