Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025554›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Comparison between presepsin, procalcitonin, and CRP as biomarkers to diagnose sepsis in critically ill patients.

Deven Juneja, Navin Jain, Omender Singh, Amit Goel, Shweta Arora

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07770334 (Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients With Acute Infectious Disease Hospitalized in the Internal Medicine Department.), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07770334 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Predictor in Patients With Acute Infectious Disease Hospitalized in the Internal Medicine Department.

TypeobservationalSponsorBarzilai Medical CenterRan2026 to 2026Enrolled1,000ConditionsProcalcitonin, Infection, Internal Medicine PatientsArmsNo Interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Presepsin in Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Presepsin is a biomarker that can predict mortality in sepsis patients.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deven JunejaInstitute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Navin JainInstitute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Omender SinghInstitute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Amit GoelInstitute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Shweta AroraInstitute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Max Super Speciality Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Mortality associated with sepsis continues to remain high. Early diagnosis and aggressive management may improve outcomes. Biomarkers may help in early diagnosis, but the search for an ideal biomarker continues. Presepsin has been introduced as a new biomarker, however, it still needs validation before its use becomes routine. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biomarkers in patients with suspected sepsis. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients with suspected infection, admitted in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) was conducted. Diagnosis of sepsis was made on the basis of the current surviving sepsis guidelines criteria. Results: Out of 100 patients, 70 were diagnosed to have sepsis, and overall ICU mortality was 22%. Overall, C-reactive protein (CRP) was positive in 98, procalcitonin in 75, and presepsin in 64 patients. For diagnosis of sepsis the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, respectively, for CRP was 98.6%, 3.3%, and 0.725. For procalcitonin (>0.5 ng/ml) it was 87.1%, 53.3%, and 0.776, and for procalcitonin (>1 ng/ml) 70%, 70%, and 0.816, respectively. For presepsin sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, respectively, for diagnosis of sepsis was 77.1%, 66.7%, and 0.734. For ICU mortality, sensitivity and specificity for CRP was 95.5% and 1.3%, for procalcitonin (>0.5) 72.7% and 24.4.%, for procalcitonin (>1) 59.1% and 42.3%, and for presepsin 61.5% and 27.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Inflammatory markers may be raised in a large proportion of ICU patients, even in those without sepsis. Procalcitnonin and presepsin had similar efficacy in diagnosing sepsis. However, none of the three biomarkers studied were accurate in predicting ICU mortality.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCRPpresepsinprocalcitoninsepsis

Identifiers

PMID38025554
PMCPMC10661623
OpenAlexW4378531243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.